ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Ten quick tips for ensuring machine learning model validity.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evaluation crisis in artificial intelligence-driven computational biology: Pitfalls and solutions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Predicability of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells based solely on H&E-stained sections.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Nine quick tips for trustworthy machine learning in the biomedical sciences.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models are increasingly deployed on biomedical and health data to shed insights on biological mechanism, predict disease outcomes, and support clinical decision-making. However, ensuring model validity is challenging. The 10 quick tips described here discuss useful practices on how to check AI/ML models from 2 perspectives-the user and the developer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.