Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298172›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2024

Red Blood Cell Transfusion in European Neonatal Intensive Care Units, 2022 to 2023.

Nina A M Houben, Suzanne Fustolo-Gunnink, Karin Fijnvandraat, Camila Caram-Deelder, Marta Aguar Carrascosa, Alain Beuchée, Kristin Brække, Francesco Cardona, Anne Debeer, Sara Domingues and 23 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Plasma transfusions in neonatal intensive care units: a prospective observational study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Nina A M HoubenSanquin Research, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne Fustolo-GunninkSanquin Research, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Karin FijnvandraatPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Camila Caram-DeelderDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marta Aguar CarrascosaDepartment of Neonatology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Alain BeuchéeDepartment of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Kristin BrækkeWomen and Children's Division, Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Francesco CardonaDivision of Neonatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anne DebeerDepartment of Neonatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sara DominguesCentro Materno-Infantil do Norte-Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Stefano GhirardelloFondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Ruza GrizeljDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Emina HadžimuratovicPaediatric Clinic, University Medical Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Christian HeiringDepartment of Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Jana Lozar KrivecFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jan MalýDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Katarina MatasovaJessenius Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Carmel Maria MooreSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tobias MuehlbacherDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Miklos SzabóDepartment of Neonatology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tomasz SzczapaII Department of Neonatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Gabriela ZaharieUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Justine de JagerDivision of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nora Johanna Reibel-GeorgiCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helen V NewNHS (National Health Service) Blood and Transplant, London, United Kingdom.
Simon J StanworthNHS (National Health Service) Blood and Transplant, London, United Kingdom.
Emöke DeschmannDepartment of Neonatology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charles C RoehrNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christof DameCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Saskia le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johanna van der BomDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Enrico LoprioreDivision of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
International Neonatal Transfusion Point Prevalence Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are frequently administered to preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Two randomized clinical trials (Effects of Transfusion Thresholds on Neurocognitive Outcomes of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants [ETTNO] and Transfusion of Prematures [TOP]) found that liberal RBC transfusion thresholds are nonsuperior to restrictive thresholds, but the extent to which these results have been integrated into clinical practice since publication in 2020 is unknown. Objective: To describe neonatal RBC transfusion practice in Europe. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international prospective observational cohort study collected data between September 1, 2022, and August 31, 2023, with a 6-week observation period per center, from 64 NICUs in 22 European countries. Participants included 1143 preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Exposure: Admission to the NICU. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study outcome measures included RBC transfusion prevalence rates, cumulative incidence, indications, pretransfusion hemoglobin (Hb) levels, volumes, and transfusion rates, Hb increment, and adverse effects of RBC transfusion. Results: A total of 1143 preterm infants were included (641 male [56.1%]; median gestational age at birth, 28 weeks plus 2 days [IQR, 26 weeks plus 2 days to 30 weeks plus 2 days]; median birth weight, 1030 [IQR, 780-1350] g), of whom 396 received 1 or more RBC transfusions, totaling 903 transfusions. Overall RBC transfusion prevalence rate during postnatal days 1 to 28 was 3.4 transfusion days per 100 admission days, with considerable variation across countries, only partly explained by patient mix. By day 28, 36.5% (95% CI, 31.6%-41.5%) of infants had received at least 1 transfusion. Most transfusions were given based on a defined Hb threshold (748 [82.8%]). Hemoglobin levels before transfusions indicated for threshold were below the restrictive thresholds set by ETTNO in 324 of 729 transfusions (44.4%) and TOP in 265 of 729 (36.4%). Conversely, they were between restrictive and liberal thresholds in 352 (48.3%) and 409 (56.1%) transfusions, respectively, and above liberal thresholds in 53 (7.3%) and 55 (7.5%) transfusions, respectively. Most transfusions given based on threshold had volumes of 15 mL/kg (470 of 738 [63.7%]) and were administered over 3 hours (400 of 738 [54.2%]), but there was substantial variation in dose and duration. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of very preterm infants, most transfusions indicated for threshold were given for pretransfusion Hb levels above restrictive transfusion thresholds evaluated in recent trials. These results underline the need to optimize practices and for implementation research to support uptake of evidence.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte TransfusionIntensive Care Units, NeonatalEuropeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39298172
PMCPMC11413711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.