ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2024
Biomarkers of Hemodynamic Congestion in Heart Failure.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Unifying and unique roles of non-coding RNA biomarkers in liver and heart fibrosis.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Review
- Plasma Steroids as Biomarkers of Congestion and Predictors of Prognosis in Acute Heart Failure During the Vulnerable Phase.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of the C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio for prognosis in heart failure patients with acute kidney injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- CA125 as a Potential Biomarker in Non-Malignant Serous Effusions: Diagnostic and Prognostic Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to describe the evidence behind various blood and imaging-based biomarkers that can improve the identification of congestion when not clearly evident on routine examination. RECENT
findingsThe natriuretic peptides (NPs) BNP and NT-proBNP have been shown to closely correlate with intra-cardiac filling pressures, both at baseline and when trended following improvement in congestion. Additionally, NPs rise well before clinical congestion is apparent so can be used as a tool to help identify subclinical HF decompensation. Additional serum-based biomarkers including MR-proANP and CA-125 can be helpful in assisting with diagnostic certainty when BNP or NT-proBNP are in the "grey zone" or when factors are present which may confound NP levels. Additionally, the emerging use of ultrasound techniques may enhance our ability to fine-tune the assessment and treatment of congestion. Biomarkers, including the blood-based natriuretic peptides and markers on bedside point of care ultrasound, can be used as non-invasive indices of hemodynamic congestion. These biomarkers are particularly valuable to incorporate when the degree of a patient's congestion is not apparent on clinical exam, and they can provide important prognostic information and help guide clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39298084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.