ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2024
Timing of Endoscopic Intervention for Esophageal Food Impaction and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEsophageal food impaction (EFI) is a common complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department. EFI requires urgent evaluation by the gastroenterology service and often necessitates esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for management. Timing of EGD in patients with EFI that does not improve with medical management remains a point of contention. We aim to evaluate outcomes of EFI in the context of time to intervention.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed among patients who presented to a multicenter health system with EFI between 2018 and 2022. Patients with EFI that did not resolve after medical management and required EGD were included. Outcome analysis evaluated rates of complications and hospitalizations.
resultsTwo hundred eighty sis unique patient presentations were included. 175 (61.2%) of patients underwent EGD within six hours of presentation, 59 (20.6%) underwent EGD six to twelve hours after presentation, and 52 (18.2%) underwent EGD beyond twelve hours after presentation. Complication rates did not differ between patients depending on timing of EGD (p = 1.000). Admission rates were higher among patients in whom EGD was performed longer after presentation (p = 0.003). Complication rates were higher among patients with advanced age (p = 0.037), prior impaction (p = 0.004), and those who have not received glucagon (p = 0.007).
conclusionTiming of EGD after presentation in patients with EFI was not associated with a difference in complication rates. Delayed intervention was associated with a higher rate of hospitalization which should be taken into consideration when assessing the cost of EFI to the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39298049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.