ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024
Detection of community-acquired respiratory viruses during COVID-19 pandemic in subtropical region in Japan.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed the dynamics of other community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs), however, information regarding the frequency of CARV detection during COVID-19 pandemic in subtropical regions is limited. Additionally, studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy between multiplex and monoplex PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are scarce.
methodsWe evaluated samples collected from patients suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Okinawa, a subtropical climate in Japan, from March 2020 to March 2021. For SARS-CoV-2, results obtained from monoplex (NIID method) and multiplex (Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay) PCR were compared.
resultsIn total, 744 samples were collected and 238 viruses were detected in 205 specimens, of which 22 showed viral co-infection. Viral co-infection was more common in patients aged 10 and under than in older patients (p = 0.0054). For CARV, 142 viruses were detected in 127 specimens (17.1%), and human rhinovirus (HRV) was most common. Overall concordance rate for two SARS-CoV-2 assays was 94.1%; 7 and 37 specimens were detected only by NIID and Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, respectively. The median cycling threshold values of the 44 samples that were only positive for either the NIID or Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay were 37.91 for E gene, 38.13 for RdRp/S gene, 38.21 for N gene and 39.16 for N2 gene.
conclusionHRV was continuously detected during COVID-19 pandemic in the subtropical region and viral co-infection was more common in younger patients. For the diagnosis of COVID-19, multiplex PCR was more reliable, especially in samples with low viral load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39297906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.