Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297889›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Changing indications for keratoplasty: monocentric analysis of the past two decades.

Jan Vincent Hoffmann, Paola Kammrath Betancor, Philip Maier, Thabo Lapp, Sonja Heinzelmann, Daniel Böhringer, Stefan Lang, Thomas Reinhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan Vincent HoffmannEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. jan.v.hoffmann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1239-8853
Paola Kammrath BetancorEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Philip MaierEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Thabo LappEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Sonja HeinzelmannEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Daniel BöhringerEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Stefan LangEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Thomas ReinhardEye Center, Medical Center, University Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver the past two decades, lamellar keratoplasty procedures, such as Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) as well as Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK), have become an integral part of clinical practice. With advances in contact lens fitting for keratoconus management and the implementation of UVA-Riboflavin Crosslinking (CXL), the landscape of keratoplasty indications is undergoing changes. Procedures and indications in a single tertiary care center over the past two decades are reviewed in this retrospective analysis.

methodsRetrospective analysis utilized anonymized electronic data from the LIONS cornea bank Baden-Württemberg, Eye Center Freiburg, spanning from beginning of 2004 to end of 2023. The primary focus was on surgical procedures and indications for keratoplasty.

resultsThe study encompassed a comprehensive analysis of 7130 corneal transplants. Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) exhibited a significant decline from 95% (n = 206, 2004) to 11% (n = 46, 2023), while DMEK increased from 48% (n = 157, 2012) to 82% (n = 347, 2023). Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) emerged as the dominant indication, witnessing a significant increase from 24% (2004, n = 39) to 72% (2023, n = 288). Conversely, keratoconus (KC) showed a reciprocal change from 25% (2004, n = 40) to 4% (2023, n = 17). PK demonstrated a noteworthy indication shift in descending order from Bullous Keratopathy (BK), FED, and KC in 2004 to KC, graft failure, corneal scars, and ulcers in 2023. Repeat keratoplasty following DMEK remained rare, but a discernible upward trend was observed for PK.

conclusionThis retrospective analysis highlights significant changes in both keratoplasty indications and techniques over the past two decades. DMEK has emerged as a successful intervention for treating endothelial diseases, while PK retains its qualitative indispensability for a wide range of indications. Modern corneal banks are urged to maintain a robust supply of grafts for all surgical techniques in anticipation of potential increased demand in the future, particularly for repeat keratoplasties. KEY MESSAGES: What is known • Over the past two decades, lamellar keratoplasty procedures such as DSAEK and DMEK have increasingly replaced penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in clinical practice due to their improved outcomes and reduced complications for certain indications. New Findings • Our study reveals a significant shift in keratoplasty indications, with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) emerging as the predominant indication, increasing from 24% in 2004 to 72% in 2023, while keratoconus (KC) declined from 25 to 4% during the same period. • Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) has shown a marked decline in use, dropping from 95% of keratoplasties in 2004 to 11% in 2023, whereas DMEK has grown to represent 82% of procedures in 2023. • Despite the rise of DMEK, PK remains vital for a broad spectrum of indications, highlighting the necessity for corneal banks to maintain a versatile supply of grafts to meet diverse clinical needs, particularly in cases of repeat keratoplasties.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyKeratoplasty, PenetratingAdultAgedEye BanksFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKeratoconusMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityCorneal graft registryCorneal re-graftDMEKEye bankingHealth care researchKeratoplastyRepeat keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID39297889
PMCPMC11953164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.