ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
A Meta-Learning Approach for Classifying Multimodal Retinal Images of Retinal Vein Occlusion With Limited Data.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal natural language processing in ophthalmology: bridging clinical text and medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A unified VQ-VAE framework for few-shot retinal vessel segmentation and multidisease classification.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To propose and validate a meta-learning approach for detecting retinal vein occlusion (RVO) from multimodal images with only a few samples. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we formulate the problem as meta-learning. The meta-training dataset consists of 1254 color fundus (CF) images from 39 different fundus diseases. Two meta-testing datasets include a public domain dataset and an independent dataset from Kandze Prefecture People's Hospital. The proposed meta-learning models comprise two modules: the feature extraction networks and the prototypical networks (PNs). We use two deep learning models (the ResNet and the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training networks [CLIP]) for feature extraction. We evaluate the performance of the algorithms using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), F1-score, and recall. Results: CLIP-based PNs outperform across all meta-testing datasets. For the public APTOS dataset, meta-learning algorithms achieve good results with an accuracy of 86.06% and an AUCROC of 0.87 with only 16 training images. In the hospital datasets, meta-learning algorithms show excellent diagnostic capability for detecting RVO with a very low number of shots (AUCROC above 0.99 for n = 4, 8, and 16, respectively). Notably, even though the meta-training dataset does not include fluorescein angiography (FA) images, meta-learning algorithms also have excellent diagnostic capability for detecting RVO from images with a different modality (AUCROC above 0.93 for n = 4, 8, and 16, respectively). Conclusions: The proposed meta-learning models excel in detecting RVO, not only on CF images but also on FA images from a different imaging modality. Translational Relevance: The proposed meta-learning models could be useful in automatically detecting RVO on CF and FA images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.