Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297678›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an Italian real-world data study.

Olga Paoletti, Giulia Hyeraci, Marco Finochietti, Maria Grazia Celani, Ilaria Bacigalupo, Niccolò Lombardi, Giada Crescioli, Marco Tuccori, Silvia Cascini, Rosa Gini and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olga PaolettiPharmacoepidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Giulia HyeraciPharmacoepidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6536-2083
Marco FinochiettiDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL Roma 1, SSR Lazio, Rome, Italy.
Maria Grazia CelaniNeurophysiopathology, Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Ilaria BacigalupoNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Niccolò LombardiSection of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giada CrescioliSection of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marco TuccoriUnit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Silvia CasciniDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL Roma 1, SSR Lazio, Rome, Italy.
Rosa GiniPharmacoepidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Antonio AddisDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL Roma 1, SSR Lazio, Rome, Italy.
Ursula KirchmayerDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL Roma 1, SSR Lazio, Rome, Italy.
CAESAR study group

Funding

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe purpose was to describe the use patterns of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies and investigate potential determinants of riluzole use in patients newly diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in three Italian regions.

methodsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients were selected from administrative healthcare databases of Latium, Tuscany and Umbria from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019 based on hospital- and disease-specific co-payment exemption data. The first trace of ALS was considered the index date. Incident ALS cases were those without a trace of ALS during the 3-year look back. Patients were described in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics and drug use at baseline, and were classified into four categories based on riluzole use in the 2 years before and 1 year after the index date: prevalent, incident, former users and non-users. Use of symptomatic pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies was described across these categories during 12 months after the index date. Determinants of riluzole use were also investigated. RESULTS AND

conclusionsA total of 1636 ALS incident subjects were detected in the three regions, mainly aged 65-74 years. Patients were generally fragile with a high prevalence of comorbidities at baseline. Riluzole was used by 27.4% of the overall study cohort at baseline and steeply increased in the first year after the index date differently between regions (Latium 61.2%, Tuscany 85.0%, Umbria 76.5%), with about half of the subjects being incident users. In the 12 months after the index date, also symptomatic therapies increased, in riluzole users and non-users. Determinants analysis showed that higher patient severity and complexity were associated with a lower likelihood of being treated with riluzole.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisRiluzoleAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroprotective AgentsRiluzoleamyotrophic lateral sclerosisdeterminants of usepharmaco‐utilizationriluzole

Identifiers

PMID39297678
PMCPMC11554872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.