Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297611›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2024

New beginnings for dead ends: polyploidy, -SSE models and the dead-end hypothesis.

Eric R Hagen, Jeremy M Beaulieu

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric R HagenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9447-7664
Jeremy M BeaulieuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1916558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the mid-20th century, it has been argued by some that the transition from diploidy to polyploidy is an 'evolutionary dead end' in plants. Although this point has been debated ever since, multiple definitions of 'dead end' have been used in the polyploidy literature, without sufficient differentiation between alternative uses. SCOPE: Here, we focus on the two most common conceptions of the dead-end hypothesis currently discussed: the 'lowering diversification' hypothesis and the 'rarely successful' hypothesis. We discuss the evidence for both hypotheses, and we use a recently developed method of inferring tip diversification rates to demonstrate tests for the effect of ploidy on diversification in Solanaceae.

conclusionsWe find that diversification rates in the family are not strongly correlated with ploidy or with the closely related trait of breeding system. We also outline recent work in the field that moves beyond the relatively simple question of whether polyploidy increases, decreases or does not significantly affect diversification rates in plants.

Indexed as

PolyploidySolanaceaeBiological EvolutionModels, Geneticdiversificationphylogenetic comparative methodsself-compatibilitySolanaceaewhole genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID39297611
PMCPMC11687621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.