ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2025
Functional outcome and quality of life index after endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Impact of Different Dacryocystorhinostomy Techniques on Patient Quality of Life in Lacrimal Duct Obstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Glasgow Benefit Inventory-Assessment of Patients Who Underwent Laser-Assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy (LDCR).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) index following non-endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (NEN-DCR) and external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXT-DCR).
methodsPatients were prospectively allocated to two groups. All adult patients presenting with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) undergoing EXT-DCR and NEN-DCR at a tertiary eye care center were included. Patients in one group underwent EXT-DCR and others NEN-DCR. Functional outcomes were measured by Munk Score and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT). A validated quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) in the local language (Odiya) was used to measure health status (social impact score) before and 1 day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the functional outcome-Munk Score and secondary outcome measures included the QOL index and the FDDT.
resultsA total of 110 patients were recruited and equally distributed ( n = 55) in both groups. The mean age of the population was 47.6 years (SD = 14.02; range 20-79 years). The majority (71%, 79/110) were female. When longitudinally followed over time, functional outcome and QOL index showed reasonably rapid and marked improvement in both groups after surgery compared to baseline scores. The Munk score ( P = 0.037) and QOL index ( P = 0.007) were marginally better on the first postoperative day for the NEN-DCR group compared to EXT-DCR but comparable at all subsequent visits. At a median follow-up of 9 weeks (range: 0.5-24 weeks), the anatomical outcome was comparable between both groups.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that functional outcome and QOL index show rapid and marked improvement in both NEN-DCR and EXT-DCR after surgery. NEN-DCR outcomes were marginally better on the first postoperative day but comparable to EXT-DCR thereafter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.