Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297436›Full record

ArticleBiology open2024

Theoretical model of impact mitigation mechanisms inherent to the North American bison skull.

Andrea Karen Persons, Youssef Hammi, Steven H Elder, Lauren B Priddy, Matthew W Priddy, Ryan Butler, Avery Schemmel, Elizabeth Whitehurst, Nayeon Lee, Mark F Horstemeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Karen PersonsJameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-4102
Youssef HammiCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3899-8748
Steven H ElderDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-2136
Lauren B PriddyCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-7586
Matthew W PriddyCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-2060
Ryan ButlerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Avery SchemmelCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.
Elizabeth WhitehurstCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.
Nayeon LeeCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-6555
Mark F HorstemeyerSchool of Engineering, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 24515, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-0063

Funding

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

North American bison (Bovidae: Bison bison) incur blunt impacts to the interparietal and frontal bones when they engage in head-to-head fights. To investigate the impact mitigation of these bones, a finite element analysis (FEA) of the skull under loading conditions was performed. Based on anatomical and histological studies, the interparietal and frontal bones are both comprised of a combination of haversian and plexiform bone and are both underlain by bony septa. Additionally, the interparietal bone is thicker than the frontal bone. Data regarding the mechanical properties of bison bone are scarce, but the results of a phylogenetic analysis infer that the material properties of the closely related domestic cow bone are a suitable proxy for use in the FEA. Results of the FEA suggest that the thickness of the interparietal bone in conjunction with the bony septa may prevent fracture stresses by helping to absorb and disperse the blunt impact energy throughout the skull. Monotonic stress levels of 294 MPa, which are below the compressive strength of bone were exhibited in the simulated bison head impacts indicating no fracture of the bones.

Indexed as

BisonSkullAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisModels, TheoreticalPhylogenyStress, MechanicalBisonCortical boneFinite element analysisMechanical properties of bonePlexiform boneReproduction

Identifiers

PMID39297436
PMCPMC11423911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.