ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024
The functional role of the rabbit digastric muscle during mastication.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Starting length and temperature dependence of eccentric muscle force-velocity behaviour.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- How temperature tunes muscle mechanics during eccentric contractions.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Article
- Muscle function and electromyography: (almost) 70 years since Doty and Bosma (1956).Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- The importance of muscle activation on the interpretation of muscle mechanical performance.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle spindle abundance is highly variable in vertebrates, but the functional determinants of this variation are unclear. Recent work has shown that human leg muscles with the lowest abundance of muscle spindles primarily function to lengthen and absorb energy, while muscles with a greater spindle abundance perform active-stretch-shorten cycles with no net work, suggesting that muscle spindle abundance may be underpinned by muscle function. Compared with other mammalian muscles, the digastric muscle contains the lowest abundance of muscle spindles and, therefore, might be expected to generate substantial negative work. However, it is widely hypothesised that as a jaw-opener (anatomically) the digastric muscle would primarily function to depress the jaw, and consequently do positive work. Through a combination of X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM), electromyography and fluoromicrometry, we characterised the 3D kinematics of the jaw and digastric muscle during feeding in rabbits. Subsequently, the work loop technique was used to simulate in vivo muscle behaviour in situ, enabling muscle force to be quantified in relation to muscle strain and hence determine the muscle's function during mastication. When functioning on either the working or balancing side, the digastric muscle generates a large amount of positive work during jaw opening, and a large amount of negative work during jaw closing, on average producing a relatively small amount of net negative work. Our data therefore further support the hypothesis that muscle spindle abundance is linked to muscle function; specifically, muscles that absorb a relatively large amount of negative work have a low spindle abundance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.