Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297150›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Machine learning-based delirium prediction in surgical in-patients: a prospective validation study.

Stefanie Jauk, Diether Kramer, Stefan Sumerauer, Sai Pavan Kumar Veeranki, Michael Schrempf, Paul Puchwein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Using AI to detect and treat delirium.Intensive care medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefanie JaukDivision of Technology and IT, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. (KAGes), 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1287-594X
Diether KramerDivision of Technology and IT, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. (KAGes), 8010 Graz, Austria.
Stefan SumerauerDepartment of Neurology, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. (KAGes), 8036 Graz, Austria.
Sai Pavan Kumar VeerankiDivision of Technology and IT, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. (KAGes), 8010 Graz, Austria.
Michael SchrempfPH Predicting Health GmbH, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Paul PuchweinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Delirium is a syndrome that leads to severe complications in hospitalized patients, but is considered preventable in many cases. One of the biggest challenges is to identify patients at risk in a hectic clinical routine, as most screening tools cause additional workload. The aim of this study was to validate a machine learning (ML)-based delirium prediction tool on surgical in-patients undergoing a systematic assessment of delirium. Materials and Methods: 738 in-patients of a vascular surgery, a trauma surgery and an orthopedic surgery department were screened for delirium using the DOS scale twice a day over their hospital stay. Concurrently, delirium risk was predicted by the ML algorithm in real-time for all patients at admission and evening of admission. The prediction was performed automatically based on existing EHR data and without any additional documentation needed. Results: 103 patients (14.0%) were screened positive for delirium using the DOS scale. Out of them, 85 (82.5%) were correctly identified by the ML algorithm. Specificity was slightly lower, detecting 463 (72.9%) out of 635 patients without delirium. The AUROC of the algorithm was 0.883 (95% CI, 0.8523-0.9147). Discussion: In this prospective validation study, the implemented machine-learning algorithm was able to detect patients with delirium in surgical departments with high discriminative performance. Conclusion: In future, this tool or similar decision support systems may help to replace time-intensive screening tools and enable efficient prevention of delirium.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportdeliriumelectronic health recordsprediction algorithmsrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39297150
PMCPMC11408728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.