Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297109›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024

The effect of escape room clinical evaluation method on satisfaction, learning, and preparedness to practice as interns of nursing students: A quasi-experimental quantitative study.

Najmeh Ghiamikeshtgar, Fereshteh Ghaljaei, Mahnaz Ghaljeh, Bentolhoda Taherizade, Nasrin Mahmoodi, Simin Sharifi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488390 (Selecting the Correct Anatomical Site for Vital Sign Measurement in Different Clinical Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07488390 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Selecting the Correct Anatomical Site for Vital Sign Measurement in Different Clinical Conditions: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Escape Room Simulation Experience

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsNursing Education, Vital Signs, Simulation Based LearningArmsEscape Room Simulation, Case-Based Learning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Najmeh GhiamikeshtgarDepartment of Operating Room, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Fereshteh GhaljaeiDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Mahnaz GhaljehDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Bentolhoda TaherizadeDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Nasrin MahmoodiDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Simin SharifiDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical evaluation utilizing the escape room game is recognized as a novel method for assessing the team-oriented performance of learners. It is a tool for evaluating teamwork skills in clinical settings, which can boost student motivation and learning. This study aimed to investigate the effect of clinical evaluation through escape rooms and feedback provision through the PEARLS (promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation) approach on pre-internship nursing students' satisfaction, learning, and preparedness to practice as interns. MATERIALS AND

methodThe current research is a quasi-experimental quantitative study conducted with a census sample of 42 sixth-semester undergraduate nursing students in 2022. The escape room method was utilized to evaluate entry preparedness into the clinical field. Reliable and valid researcher-made questionnaires were administered to assess the impact of the intervention on learning, satisfaction, and preparedness. The data were analyzed in SPSS version 26 using descriptive and inferential tests. The significance level was considered to be less than 0.05.

resultsTwenty-six males and 16 females constituted the 42 participants (mean age: 23.46 years). The clinical evaluation method of the escape room game was deemed satisfactory or highly satisfactory by 80% of students. From the perspective of 72% of students, escape rooms were definitely or highly effective in shaping their preparedness to enter the clinical field. Comparing the students' mean learning scores (self-assessment of clinical skills) before and after the test revealed that their post-test scores (55/16 ± 13/33) were significantly higher than their pre-test scores (45/58 ± 16/58) (

conclusionsIt appears that using the escape room evaluation method in conjunction with other student evaluation methods has helped improve students' interpersonal communication, problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and teamwork. The experience of working in a group not only improves these skills and is enjoyable to students but can also enhance their learning. Clinical education is dependent on teamwork. The escape room test can be viewed as a valuable tool for encouraging students to collaborate as a team. Therefore, it is suggested that students in all medical education groups be evaluated clinically using this test.

Indexed as

Escape roomgameslearningnursing educationnursing student

Identifiers

PMID39297109
PMCPMC11410231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.