ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Readiness for self-directed learning among basic sciences medical students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the soft skills of nurses and health technicians: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-directed learning is a required skill for medical students for remaining lifelong learners. This study focuses on measuring the readiness for self-directed learning of basic sciences medical students. MATERIALS AND
methodIn the second half of 2022, a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 288 basic sciences medical students at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Iran. The students were selected using convenience sampling. The instrument used was Fisher's self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) scale consisting of "self-management", "desire for learning", and "self-control" domains. The data were analyzed by SPSS-25 and also by using descriptive statistics [mean, standard deviation (SD), median, frequency, and percentage] and inferential statistics techniques (Chi-square test and
resultThe results revealed that the scores of 63.9% students were more than 150. Also, the mean total score of self-directed learning readiness was 152.98 (SD = 16.76), suggesting that the self-directed learning readiness of the students was high level. The highest score was for "self-control" (59.99 ± 6.95), followed by "desire for learning" (46.99 ± 5.64) and "self-management" (46.01 ± 7.07). The total SDLR score and its three sub-scales did not show any notable interdependence with student contextual factors (age, gender, marital and residential status). However, a higher cumulative grade point average (>17) showed a significant higher mean in the "self-management" domain of SDLR among medical students (F = 3.730;
conclusionTo become life-long learners, self-directed learning is crucial for medical students. The basic sciences medical students participating in this study showed a high level of SDL readiness. Even though the students obtained the highest score for the self-control sub-scale, the desire for learning and self-management skills needs further improvement, which can be achieved through multi-disciplinary approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.