Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297088›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024

The survey of learning experience of pediatric injection among registered nurses and nursing students using a design thinking approach.

Chanita Tantacharoenrat, Monamorn Precharattana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chanita TantacharoenratInstitute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Monamorn PrecharattanaInstitute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPediatric injection is an essential skill of nursing. The survey of the learner's experience during the learning process helps identify problems and leads to improvement. We here applied a three-phrase design thinking framework. The study aims to investigate (1) the registered nurses' experience in learning injection technique, (2) the nursing students' experience in learning injection, and (3) the cause of problems and to propose (4) a learning material that will be used to solve the encountered problems. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was applied. The study employed convenience sampling. Registered nurses from a tertiary hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and fourth-year nursing students from a nursing school in Bangkok, Thailand, were selected. The data collecting tools contain a personal information form and the experience of injection learning. The inferential and descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.

resultsThe results show that the major issues of injection learning include selecting the correct site for injection and determining the needle length and injection angle and contamination.

conclusionsTherefore, teaching materials for the anatomy of the injection area and the technique to determine the correct size and depth of injection are needed.

Indexed as

Design thinkinginjection learninglearning experiencenursing educationnursing student

Identifiers

PMID39297088
PMCPMC11410262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.