Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297080›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images.

Stephen Skett, Tina Patel, Didier Duprez, Sunnia Gupta, Tucker Netherton, Christoph Trauernicht, Sarah Aldridge, David Eaton, Carlos Cardenas, Laurence E Court and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephen SkettGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tina PatelGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Didier DuprezStellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sunnia GuptaGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tucker NethertonThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Christoph TrauernichtStellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sarah AldridgeGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
David EatonGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Carlos CardenasUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Laurence E CourtThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Daniel SmithGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ajay AggarwalGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at the University of Alabama at BirminghamK12TR004769 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Renee A. Heffron, Lucio Miele · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95 Results: The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to 'missed' disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield "full coverage" (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits. Conclusions: Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Auto-contouringComputed tomographyDeep learningGTVLung diseaseRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39297080
PMCPMC11408859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.