Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297049›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2024

A comprehensive review of enhanced CO

Shreyase Kundu, Tasmina Khandaker, Md Al-Amin Mia Anik, Md Kamrul Hasan, Palash Kumar Dhar, Sagar Kumar Dutta, M Abdul Latif, Muhammad Sarwar Hossain

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Performance of porous carbons based on waste-printed paper on the COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Triazole-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tailored Carbon Nanocomposites for Efficient COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shreyase KunduChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.
Tasmina KhandakerDepartment of Chemistry, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering & Technology (BAUET) Qadirabad Cantonment Natore-6431 Bangladesh.
Md Al-Amin Mia AnikChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.
Md Kamrul HasanChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.
Palash Kumar DharChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.
Sagar Kumar DuttaChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1955-6155
M Abdul LatifDepartment of Chemistry, Begum Rokeya University Rangpur-5404 Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0454-3083
Muhammad Sarwar HossainChemistry Discipline, Khulna University Khulna-9208 Bangladesh sarwar@chem.ku.ac.bd.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2072-4332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing level of atmospheric CO

Identifiers

PMID39297049
PMCPMC11409178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.