ArticleRSC advances2024
Enhanced properties of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose films
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eco-friendly fabrication of bacterial cellulose nanopaper with enhanced strength and toughness from a powder suspension.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Enhancement of Bagasse Paper Properties for Sustainable Packaging via Bentonite and Alginate Loading in Shellac coatings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Antibacterial Food Packaging with Chitosan and Cellulose Blends for Food Preservation.Polymers · 2025Review
- Cellulose Nanocrystal and Self-Assembling Lignin Enhanced the PEDOT/PSS/PVA Composite on Mechanical and Self-Powered Wearable Properties.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing a simple and environmentally friendly method to vary the physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of cellulose films is of great importance. This study aimed to characterize 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized bacterial cellulose (BC) films prepared using non-pressurized hot water vapor (NPHWV) method. A wet BC-pellicle that had been oxidized with TEMPO was treated with NPHWV for 60, 120, and 240 minutes, respectively. As a control, a TEMPO-oxidized BC (TOBC) film without NPHWV was prepared. The results show that the longer NPHWV duration of the TOBC film increased the tensile and thermal properties. This film became more hydrophobic and showed lower moisture absorption, thermal conductivity and organic solvent uptake, more crystalline structure, and higher fiber density after NPHWV treatment. The acquired results provide a simple, inexpensive, and ecologically friendly method for varying TOBC film properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.