Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297021›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2024

Structural Modeling of Early Ambulation Progression in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Covariance Structure Analysis Approach.

Jun Nakayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jun NakayamaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to elucidate the causal relationships between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items and consciousness levels in patients with stroke and low consciousness levels 2 weeks after initiating occupational therapy (OT). This modeling sought to identify the factors influencing the number of days required to get out of bed. Methods: SEM was used for multifactorial simultaneous analysis in a study of 22 patients with a Japan Coma Scale score of 20 after stroke. The Glasgow Coma Scale was used to evaluate patients' consciousness level; FIMs were used to evaluate activities of daily living in the ward. Influencing factors, including "bed/chair transfers" and "toilet transfers," were defined as "transfer functions," while factors involving "social interactions," "comprehension," "memory," "problem solving," and "expression" were defined as "cognitive decline." Results: After 2 weeks, standardized coefficients showed that "transfer functions" and "cognitive decline" had effects of -0.33 and -0.25, respectively, on "early ambulation days." Further analysis revealed that improvements in "consciousness level" impacted "early ambulation days," with coefficients of -0.35 for "transfer functions" and 0.14 for "cognitive decline." Through the "consciousness level" observation variable, the coefficients of indirect effects were -0.27 for "transfer function" on "days to get out of bed," 0.38 for "cognitive decline," and -0.06 for "self-care" on "early ambulation days." Conclusions: Improvement in transfer movements and cognitive decline influenced the number of days required to get out of bed without improving consciousness or affecting early ambulation.

Indexed as

cognitionconsciousnessfunctional independence

Identifiers

PMID39297021
PMCPMC11406324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.