ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the selective control assessment of the lower extremity in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Version of the Motor Fitness Scale in Saudi Older Adults: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Brazilian Portuguese Version Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) After Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: Forty-five children with spastic CP (mean age 7.29 years, SD 2.87 years, rang 4-16 years) were recruited. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α, while test-retest and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Construct validity was established through correlation and confirmatory factor analyses. Discriminative validity was assessed by comparing SCALE scores across varying GMFCS levels. Results: The Chinese version of SCALE demonstrates high internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The Chinese version of SCALE shows good reliability and validity for assessing lower limb selective movement control in children with spastic cerebral palsy in China. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205380, identifier ChiCTR2400083880.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.