Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296931›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

GeneSPIDER2: large scale GRN simulation and benchmarking with perturbed single-cell data.

Mateusz Garbulowski, Thomas Hillerton, Daniel Morgan, Deniz Seçilmiş, Lisbet Sonnhammer, Andreas Tjärnberg, Torbjörn E M Nordling, Erik L L Sonnhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mateusz GarbulowskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-194X
Thomas HillertonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-0659
Daniel MorganDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8326-6178
Deniz SeçilmişDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.
Lisbet SonnhammerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.
Andreas TjärnbergDepartment of Neuro-Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center, WI 53705, USA.
Torbjörn E M NordlingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-6707
Erik L L SonnhammerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, Solna 171 21, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell data is increasingly used for gene regulatory network (GRN) inference, and benchmarks for this have been developed based on simulated data. However, existing single-cell simulators cannot model the effects of gene perturbations. A further challenge lies in generating large-scale GRNs that often struggle with computational and stability issues. We present GeneSPIDER2, an update of the GeneSPIDER MATLAB toolbox for GRN benchmarking, inference, and analysis. Several software modules have improved capabilities and performance, and new functionalities have been added. A major improvement is the ability to generate large GRNs with biologically realistic topological properties in terms of scale-free degree distribution and modularity. Another major addition is a simulation of single-cell data, which is becoming increasingly popular as input for GRN inference. Specifically, we introduced the unique feature to generate single-cell data based on genetic perturbations. Finally, the simulated single-cell data was compared to real single-cell Perturb-seq data from two cell lines, showing that the synthetic and real data exhibit similar properties.

Identifiers

PMID39296931
PMCPMC11409065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.