Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

A synthetic lung model (ASYLUM) for validation of functional lung imaging methods shows significant differences between signal-based and deformation-field-based ventilation measurements.

Andreas Voskrebenzev, Marcel Gutberlet, Filip Klimeš, Till F Kaireit, Hoen-Oh Shin, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Tobias Welte, Frank Wacker, Jens Vogel-Claussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas VoskrebenzevInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Marcel GutberletInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Filip KlimešInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Till F KaireitInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hoen-Oh ShinInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias WelteBiomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany.
Frank WackerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jens Vogel-ClaussenInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Validation of functional free-breathing MRI involves a comparison to more established or more direct measurements. This procedure is cost-intensive, as it requires access to patient cohorts, lengthy protocols, expenses for consumables, and binds working time. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to introduce a synthetic lung model (ASYLUM), which mimics dynamic MRI acquisition and includes predefined lung abnormalities for an alternative validation approach. The model is evaluated with different registration and quantification methods and compared with real data. Methods: A combination of trigonometric functions, deformation fields, and signal combinations were used to create 20 synthetic image time series. Lung voxels were assigned either to normal or one of six abnormality classes. The images were registered with three registration algorithms. The registered images were further analyzed with three quantification methods: deformation-based or signal-based regional ventilation (JVent/RVent) analysis and perfusion amplitude (QA). The registration results were compared with predefined deformations. Quantification methods were evaluated regarding predefined amplitudes and with respect to sensitivity, specificity, and spatial overlap of defects. In addition, 36 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included for verification of model interpretations using CT as the gold standard. Results: One registration method showed considerably lower quality results (76% correlation vs. 92/97%, Conclusion: The feasibility of a validation framework for free-breathing functional lung imaging using synthetic time series was demonstrated. Evaluating different ventilation measurements, important differences were detected in synthetic and real data, with signal-based regional ventilation assessment being a more reliable method in the investigated setting.

Indexed as

Fourier decompositionfree-breathingJacobianlung proton MRIphantomPREFULregistration

Identifiers

PMID39296894
PMCPMC11409849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.