ArticleBioactive materials2024
Multi-modal investigation of the bone micro- and ultrastructure, and elemental distribution in the presence of Mg-xGd screws at mid-term healing stages.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Evolution of Interfacial pH and HMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Paired CycleGAN-based virtual staining for 3D X-ray histology of bone-implant systems.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- The Recent Developments of Thermomechanical Processing for Biomedical Mg Alloys and Their Clinical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Computational modelling of bone growth and mineralization surrounding biodegradable Mg-based and permanent Ti implants.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Degradation behavior of porous magnesium alloy scaffold under the low-intensity pulsed ultrasound intervention and their effect on bone defects repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnesium (Mg) - based alloys are becoming attractive materials for medical applications as temporary bone implants for support of fracture healing, e.g. as a suture anchor. Due to their mechanical properties and biocompatibility, they may replace titanium or stainless-steel implants, commonly used in orthopedic field. Nevertheless, patient safety has to be assured by finding a long-term balance between metal degradation, osseointegration, bone ultrastructure adaptation and element distribution in organs. In order to determine the implant behavior and its influence on bone and tissues, we investigated two Mg alloys with gadolinium contents of 5 and 10 wt percent in comparison to permanent materials titanium and polyether ether ketone. The implants were present in rat tibia for 10, 20 and 32 weeks before sacrifice of the animal. Synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography enables the distinction of features like residual metal, degradation layer and bone structure. Additionally, X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence yield information on parameters describing the bone ultrastructure and elemental composition at the bone-to-implant interface. Finally, with element specific mass spectrometry, the elements and their accumulation in the main organs and tissues are traced. The results show that Mg-xGd implants degrade
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.