ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
VICTOR: Validation and inspection of cell type annotation through optimal regression.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing provides unprecedent opportunities to explore the heterogeneity and dynamics inherent in cellular biology. An essential step in the data analysis involves the automatic annotation of cells. Despite development of numerous tools for automated cell annotation, assessing the reliability of predicted annotations remains challenging, particularly for rare and unknown cell types. Here, we introduce VICTOR: Validation and inspection of cell type annotation through optimal regression. VICTOR aims to gauge the confidence of cell annotations by an elastic-net regularized regression with optimal thresholds. We demonstrated that VICTOR performed well in identifying inaccurate annotations, surpassing existing methods in diagnostic ability across various single-cell datasets, including within-platform, cross-platform, cross-studies, and cross-omics settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.