Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296807›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Privacy-preserving decentralized learning methods for biomedical applications.

Mohammad Tajabadi, Roman Martin, Dominik Heider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad TajabadiInstitute of Computer Science, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Graf-Adolf-Str. 63, Duesseldorf, 40215, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Roman MartinInstitute of Computer Science, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Graf-Adolf-Str. 63, Duesseldorf, 40215, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Dominik HeiderInstitute of Computer Science, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Graf-Adolf-Str. 63, Duesseldorf, 40215, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, decentralized machine learning has emerged as a significant advancement in biomedical applications, offering robust solutions for data privacy, security, and collaboration across diverse healthcare environments. In this review, we examine various decentralized learning methodologies, including federated learning, split learning, swarm learning, gossip learning, edge learning, and some of their applications in the biomedical field. We delve into the underlying principles, network topologies, and communication strategies of each approach, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Ultimately, the selection of a suitable method should be based on specific needs, infrastructures, and computational capabilities.

Indexed as

Edge learningFederated learningGossip learningSplit learningSwarm learning

Identifiers

PMID39296807
PMCPMC11408144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.