ArticleThe East African health research journal2024
Coverage of Child Disability Detection, Management, and Rehabilitation Health Services in Central Uganda.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Care perspectives: Mothers of children with disabilities in a peri-urban setting in South Africa.African journal of disability · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Child disability is a significant public health concern which impacts 1 in 20 children. Children with disabilities (CwDs) encounter deprivation of rights, biases in society, and a lack of access to necessary services, all of which are exacerbated by structural obstacles. This study assessed the coverage of child disability prevention, management and rehabilitation services in four districts of Central Uganda after two years of interventions to improve these services. Methods: The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) rapid health facility assessment method was employed to assess coverage of services based on sixteen indicators. The indicators were set based on constructs of: provision of disability-related services to CwDs; use of rehabilitation services; readiness of the health facilities (HFs) to provide basic disability management and rehabilitation services; community structures for linkage to disability management and rehabilitation services; psychosocial support provision; and upholding and protecting the rights of CwDs. A district-level decision rule was set based on 80% coverage target. Results: Despite the interventions, the services have yet to provide the desired level of benefit to CwDs and their caregivers. Out of the sixteen indicators for healthcare service coverage for CwDs, only three attained the 80% coverage target. Conclusion: The findings suggest that greater focus by health service planners and project implementers is still needed, especially at the community and health facility levels to enhance the prevention, management and rehabilitation of CwDs. Psychosocial health services for caregivers of CwDs need special attention in order to achieve better service approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.