Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296709›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024

A review of artificial intelligence methods enabled music-evoked EEG emotion recognition and their applications.

Yan Su, Yong Liu, Yan Xiao, Jiaqi Ma, Dezhao Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan SuSchool of Art, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou, China.
Yong LiuSchool of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Yan XiaoSchool of Arts and Media, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jiaqi MaCollege of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Dezhao LiCollege of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music is an archaic form of emotional expression and arousal that can induce strong emotional experiences in listeners, which has important research and practical value in related fields such as emotion regulation. Among the various emotion recognition methods, the music-evoked emotion recognition method utilizing EEG signals provides real-time and direct brain response data, playing a crucial role in elucidating the neural mechanisms underlying music-induced emotions. Artificial intelligence technology has greatly facilitated the research on the recognition of music-evoked EEG emotions. AI algorithms have ushered in a new era for the extraction of characteristic frequency signals and the identification of novel feature signals. The robust computational capabilities of AI have provided fresh perspectives for the development of innovative quantitative models of emotions, tailored to various emotion recognition paradigms. The discourse surrounding AI algorithms in the context of emotional classification models is gaining momentum, with their applications in music therapy, neuroscience, and social activities increasingly coming under the spotlight. Through an in-depth analysis of the complete process of emotion recognition induced by music through electroencephalography (EEG) signals, we have systematically elucidated the influence of AI on pertinent research issues. This analysis offers a trove of innovative approaches that could pave the way for future research endeavors.

Indexed as

applicationsartificial intelligenceemotion recognitionmusic-inducedpersonalization

Identifiers

PMID39296709
PMCPMC11408483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.