ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Predictors of Sepsis and Sepsis-related Mortality in Critically Ill Burn Patients: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of the abbreviated burn severity index with mortality in severely burned patients: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Risk Factors for Sepsis and Pulmonary Embolism Mortality in Burn Patients by Using a Competing Risk Model: A Machine Learning Approach.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical diagnosis of sepsis is challenging, emphasizing the importance of regular bacterial surveillance, and tailored antimicrobial therapy. This study aims to elucidate the predictors of sepsis in critically ill burn patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit between 2016 and 2022. Demographics, type of burn, total body surface area (TBSA), presence of inhalation injury, mortality, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, cultures, and laboratory findings were collected. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were used to analyze trends during the 7-year period. Results: The study encompassed 196 participants. Among patient factors, men constituted 73.4% (n = 102) of those without sepsis and 86.0% (n = 49) with sepsis, with an association between sepsis and lower age (34 versus 41 years) as well as larger TBSA (41.1% versus 17.3%). Inhalation injury was a significant predictor of sepsis [35.1% (n = 20) versus 11.6% (n = 16)]. Mortality was higher in sepsis cases [17.5% (n = 10) versus 2.9% (n = 4)], as well as positive blood cultures [47.4% (n = 27) versus 2.2% (n = 3)], positive wound cultures [71.9% (n = 41) versus 12.2% (n = 17)], and positive fungal cultures [12.3% (n = 7) versus 0% (n = 0)]. Multivariable analysis identified age and TBSA as significant predictors of sepsis ( Conclusions: Age, TBSA affected emerge as a strong risk factor for sepsis among critically ill burn patients. It underscores the need for vigilant monitoring to improve outcomes and reduce sepsis-related mortality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.