Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296587›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024

Different strategies in left ventricle unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis.

Han Zhang, Tianlong Wang, Jing Wang, Gang Liu, Shujie Yan, Yuan Teng, Jian Wang, Bingyang Ji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Han ZhangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tianlong WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shujie YanDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuan TengDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bingyang JiDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular (LV) overload is a frequent complication during VA-ECMO associated with poor outcomes. Many strategies of LV unloading have been documented but lack of evidence shows which is better. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare different LV unloading strategies. Methods: We searched databases for all published studies on LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO. The pre-defined primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results: 45 observational studies (34235 patients) were included. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking values (SUCRA) demonstrated that compared to no unloading strategy (15.4 %), IABP (73.8 %), pLVAD (60.8 %), atrial septostomy (51.2 %), catheter venting (48.8 %) were all associated with decreased all-cause mortality, in which IABP and pLVAD existed statistical significance. For secondary outcomes, no unloading group had the shortest VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the lower risk of complications compared with unloading strategies. IABP was associated with reducing VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the risk of complications (except for hemolysis as the second best) compared with other unloading strategies. Conclusions: LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO were associated with improved survival compared to no unloading, but the tendency to increase the risk of various complications deserves more consideration.

Indexed as

Atrial septostomyIntra-aortic balloon pumpLeft ventricular unloadingPercutaneous left ventricular assist deviceVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID39296587
PMCPMC11408045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.