Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Deep learning-based ultrasonographic classification of canine chronic kidney disease.

Heejung Yu, In-Gyu Lee, Jun-Young Oh, Jaehwan Kim, Ji-Hoon Jeong, Kidong Eom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heejung YuDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In-Gyu LeeDepartment of Computer Science, College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young OhDepartment of Computer Science, College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jaehwan KimDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hoon Jeong *Department of Computer Science, College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Kidong Eom *Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In veterinary medicine, attempts to apply artificial intelligence (AI) to ultrasonography have rarely been reported, and few studies have investigated the value of AI in ultrasonographic diagnosis. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based model for classifying the status of canine chronic kidney disease (CKD) using renal ultrasonographic images and assess its diagnostic performance in comparison with that of veterinary imaging specialists, thereby verifying its clinical utility. Materials and methods: In this study, 883 ultrasonograms were obtained from 198 dogs, including those diagnosed with CKD according to the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) guidelines and healthy dogs. After preprocessing and labeling each image with its corresponding IRIS stage, the renal regions were extracted and classified based on the IRIS stage using the convolutional neural network-based object detection algorithm You Only Look Once. The training scenarios consisted of multi-class classification, categorization of images into IRIS stages, and four binary classifications based on specific IRIS stages. To prevent model overfitting, we balanced the dataset, implemented early stopping, used lightweight models, and applied dropout techniques. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic curve and compared with the diagnostic accuracy of four specialists. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities among specialists were also evaluated. Results: The developed model exhibited a low accuracy of 0.46 in multi-class classification. However, a significant performance improvement was observed in binary classifications, with the model designed to distinguish stage 3 or higher showing the highest accuracy of 0.85. In this classification, recall, precision, and F1 score values were all 0.85, and the area under the curve was 0.89. Compared with radiologists, whose accuracy ranged from 0.48 to 0.62 in this experimental scenario, the AI model exhibited superiority. Intra-observer reliability among radiologists was substantial, whereas inter-observer variability showed a moderate level of agreement. Conclusions: This study developed a deep-learning framework capable of reliably classifying CKD IRIS stages 3 and 4 in dogs using ultrasonograms. The developed framework demonstrated higher accuracy than veterinary imaging specialists and provided more objective and consistent interpretations. Therefore, deep-learning-based ultrasound diagnostics are potentially valuable tools for diagnosing CKD in dogs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecaninechronic kidney diseasedeep learning-based disease diagnosisultrasonographic classification

Identifiers

PMID39296582
PMCPMC11408351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.