ArticleIDCases2024
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus following recombinant zoster vaccine: A case report and brief literature review.
Article in IDCases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute retinal necrosis following cataract surgery: a case of VZV reactivation and successful management.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Reactivation of Varicella-Zoster Virus Keratitis after Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccination: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Immunizations have long been pivotal in preventing diseases like HZ (herpes zoster), caused by VZV (varicella zoster virus). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RZV (recombinant zoster vaccine) compared to the ZVL (zoster vaccine live) and to report rare adverse events following RZV administration. Observation: Herein, we report an unusual case of a 59-year-old man who developed a V1-limited rash with a positive HZ PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test following administration of RZV in the United States. Conclusion: The development of RZV has significantly improved the prevention of HZ compared to ZVL. Nevertheless, rare adverse events, such as dermatomal reactions, underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and research into the immunomodulatory effects of RZV. Physicians should continue to administer the RZV to patients but be cognizant that reactivation may rarely subsequently occur. Case Presentation: The patient with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia was treated at an outside hospital two days after receiving the RZV complaining of paresthesia and a rash on his nasolacrimal area and forehead. The patient presented to the ED (emergency department), 9 days post-vaccination due to persistence of his symptoms despite use of amoxicillin, valacyclovir, and an unidentified eye drop. The dose of valacyclovir was increased, and he completed 1 g TID (three times a day) PO (per orally) for 10 days with subsequent resolution of symptoms. A positive PCR test confirmed the diagnosis of HZ. Topical mupirocin ointment was initiated and the patient was referred for ophthalmologic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.