Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296530›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2024

Comparison of differences in performance between pigs whose sires were identified using different selection strategies after experimental infection with PRRSV.

Erin A Little, Jenelle Dunkelberger, Daniel Hanson, John Eggert, Michael G Gonda, Michael D MacNeil, Scott Dee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erin A LittlePipestone Applied Research, Pipestone, MN 56164, USA.
Jenelle DunkelbergerTopigs Norsvin USA, Burnsville, MN 55337, USA.
Daniel HansonPipestone Applied Research, Pipestone, MN 56164, USA.
John EggertTopigs Norsvin USA, Burnsville, MN 55337, USA.
Michael G GondaDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Michael D MacNeilDelta G, Miles City, MT 59301, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-7508
Scott DeePipestone Applied Research, Pipestone, MN 56164, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in the performance of offspring of boars selected with an index emphasizing resilience and boars selected based on a traditional index, emphasizing feed efficiency and carcass quality (traditional) index vs. a customized (resilience) index. The resilience index was identical to the traditional index, except that extra emphasis was placed on piglet vitality (increased by 66%), growth rate (decreased by 14%), and feed intake (increased substantially by 5,157%). Sows were mated to either boars selected based on the resilience index or boars selected on the traditional index. Weaned offspring were vaccinated for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) and experimentally infected with PRRSV RFLP 1-7-4 four weeks later. Offspring were allocated to pens (

Indexed as

diseaseindex selectionporcine reproductive and respiratory syndromeresilienceswine

Identifiers

PMID39296530
PMCPMC11408270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.