Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296437›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medicine and life2024

Decoding visual evoked potential latency: revealing neurological connections in Parkinson's disease.

Diana Sipos-Lascu, Ştefan Cristian Vesa, Nicu-Catalin Draghici, Livia Livint Popa, Lacramioara Perju-Dumbrava

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana Sipos-LascuDepartment of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ştefan Cristian VesaDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nicu-Catalin DraghiciDepartment of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Livia Livint PopaDepartment of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lacramioara Perju-DumbravaDepartment of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by diverse motor and non-motor symptoms. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) provide valuable insights into the neurological changes in PD. This study examines VEP latency to explore potential connections between visual processing and PD progression, focusing on whether inter-eye latency differences are influenced by disease severity and symptomatology. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 59 PD patients at the Neurology I Clinic, Cluj-Napoca County Emergency Clinical Hospital, from October 2019 to October 2021. Patients underwent neurological and psychological evaluations, including VEP testing with a reversal pattern technique. P100 wave latency was assessed for both eyes, and associations with clinical indicators like Hoehn and Yahr stages, UPDRS scores, and non-motor symptoms were analyzed. VEP latencies for the right and left eyes were 108.7 ± 10.6 ms and 108.4 ± 9.7 ms, respectively, with no significant inter-eye differences (

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualParkinson DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleanhedoniaapathynon-motor symptomsParkinson's diseasevisual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID39296437
PMCPMC11407499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.