Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296410›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Vijitha Periyasamy, Katherine Gisi, Manojit Pramanik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vijitha PeriyasamyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-9494
Katherine GisiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Manojit PramanikDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2865-5714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries cause pain and if not diagnosed, it may lead to the loss of teeth in extreme cases. Dental X-ray imaging is the gold standard for caries detection; however, it cannot detect hidden caries. In addition, the ionizing nature of X-ray radiation is another concern. Hence, other alternate imaging modalities like photoacoustic (PA) imaging are being explored for dental imaging. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy (ARPAM) to image a tooth with metal filling, circular photoacoustic computed tomography (cPACT) to acquire images of teeth with caries and pigmentation, and linear array-based photoacoustic imaging (lPACT) of teeth with caries and pigmentation. The cavity measured with lPACT imaging is compared with the X-ray computed tomography image. The metal filling and its boundaries are clearly seen in the ARPAM image. cPACT images at 1064 nm were a better representative of the tooth surface compared to the images acquired at 532 nm. It was possible to detect the cavities present in the dentine when lPACT imaging was used. The PA signal from the pigmented caries on the lateral surface (occlusion view) of the tooth was high when imaged using the lPACT system.

Identifiers

PMID39296410
PMCPMC11407247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.