ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Mechanically sheared axially swept light-sheet microscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the Multiscale Morphology of Somatic Oncogenic Alterations in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- pan-ASLM: Axially Swept Light Sheet Microscopy for Fast and High-Resolution Imaging of Expanded Samples.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- Mechanical de-skewing enables high-resolution imaging of thin tissue slices with a mesoSPIM light-sheet microscope.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a mechanically sheared image acquisition format for upright and open-top light-sheet microscopes that automatically places data in its proper spatial context. This approach, which reduces computational post-processing and eliminates unnecessary interpolation or duplication of the data, is demonstrated on an upright variant of axially swept light-sheet microscopy (ASLM) that achieves a field of view, measuring 774 × 435 microns, that is 3.2-fold larger than previous models and a raw and isotropic resolution of ∼460 nm. Combined, we demonstrate the power of this approach by imaging sub-diffraction beads, cleared biological tissues, and expanded specimens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.