ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Pretraining of 3D image segmentation models for retinal OCT using denoising-based self-supervised learning.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ISOSNet: a unified framework for cone photoreceptor detection and inner segment and outer segment length measurement from AO-OCT B-scans.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning algorithms have allowed the automation of segmentation for many biomarkers in retinal OCTs, enabling comprehensive clinical research and precise patient monitoring. These segmentation algorithms predominantly rely on supervised training and specialised segmentation networks, such as U-Nets. However, they require segmentation annotations, which are challenging to collect and require specialized expertise. In this paper, we explore leveraging 3D self-supervised learning based on image restoration techniques, that allow to pretrain 3D networks with the aim of improving segmentation performance. We test two methods, based on image restoration and denoising. After pretraining on a large 3D OCT dataset, we evaluate our weights by fine-tuning them on two challenging fluid segmentation datasets utilising different amount of training data. The chosen methods are easy to set up while providing large improvements for fluid segmentation, enabling the reduction of the amount of required annotation or an increase in the performance. Overall, the best results were obtained for denoising-based SSL methods, with higher results on both fluid segmentation datasets as well as faster pretraining durations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.