Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296367›Full record

ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2024

Cell-free synthesis of infective phages from

Camilla S Kristensen, Anders Ø Petersen, Mogens Kilstrup, Eric van der Helm, Adam Takos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A fully synthetic Golden Gate assembly system for engineering aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Genome synthesis, assembly, and rebooting of therapeutically useful high G+C% mycobacteriophages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilla S KristensenSNIPR Biome, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-8455
Anders Ø PetersenSNIPR Biome, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-5351
Mogens KilstrupDTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-723X
Eric van der HelmSNIPR Biome, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-2529
Adam TakosSNIPR Biome, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages are promising alternatives to traditional antimicrobial treatment of bacterial infections. To further increase the potential of phages, efficient engineering methods are needed. This study investigates an approach to phage engineering based on phage rebooting and compares selected methods of assembly and rebooting of phage genomes. GG assembly of phage genomes and subsequent rebooting by cell-free transcription-translation reactions yielded the most efficient phage engineering and allowed production of a proof-of-concept T7 phage library of 1.8 × 10

Indexed as

DNA assemblyphagephage libraryrebootingTXTL reaction

Identifiers

PMID39296367
PMCPMC11409935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.