Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296349›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2024

Identifying Transfer Learning in the Reshaping of Inductive Biases.

Anna Székely, Balázs Török, Mariann Kiss, Karolina Janacsek, Dezső Németh, Gergő Orbán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna SzékelyDepartment of Computational Sciences, HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33., H-1121, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8654-7733
Balázs TörökMozalearn Ltd, 6720, Szeged, Hungary.
Mariann KissDepartment of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Karolina JanacsekCentre for Thinking and Learning, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, SE10 9LS United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-8220
Dezső NémethUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, 69500, Bron, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-5856
Gergő OrbánDepartment of Computational Sciences, HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33., H-1121, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-5912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfer learning, the reuse of newly acquired knowledge under novel circumstances, is a critical hallmark of human intelligence that has frequently been pitted against the capacities of artificial learning agents. Yet, the computations relevant to transfer learning have been little investigated in humans. The benefit of efficient inductive biases (meta-level constraints that shape learning, often referred as priors in the Bayesian learning approach), has been both theoretically and experimentally established. Efficiency of inductive biases depends on their capacity to generalize earlier experiences. We argue that successful transfer learning upon task acquisition is ensured by updating inductive biases and transfer of knowledge hinges upon capturing the structure of the task in the inductive bias that can be reused in novel tasks. To explore this, we trained participants on a non-trivial visual stimulus sequence task (Alternating Serial Response Times, ASRT); during the Training phase, participants were exposed to one specific sequence for multiple days, then on the Transfer phase, the sequence changed, while the underlying structure of the task remained the same. Our results show that beyond the acquisition of the stimulus sequence, our participants were also able to update their inductive biases. Acquisition of the new sequence was considerably sped up by earlier exposure but this enhancement was specific to individuals showing signatures of abandoning initial inductive biases. Enhancement of learning was reflected in the development of a new internal model. Additionally, our findings highlight the ability of participants to construct an inventory of internal models and alternate between them based on environmental demands. Further, investigation of the behavior during transfer revealed that it is the subjective internal model of individuals that can predict the transfer across tasks. Our results demonstrate that even imperfect learning in a challenging environment helps learning in a new context by reusing the subjective and partial knowledge about environmental regularities.

Indexed as

generalizationinductive biaseslearning to learnmetalearningnon-parametric bayesian modelingstatistical learningtransfer

Identifiers

PMID39296349
PMCPMC11410354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.