ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Effects of hybrid emergency department on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hybrid emergency department (ED), which are equipped with fluoroscopy and computed tomography has been developed in Japan as a novel emergency care room. Although hybrid ED is effective in improving the outcomes of severe trauma, its influence on the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) remains unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of hybrid ED on ECPR procedures and outcome in OHCA patients focusing on time from hospital arrival to establishment of ECPR. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted, including adult OHCA patients who underwent ECPR between April 2013 and March 2022. Patients treated in conventional ED were compared with those in hybrid ED. Primary outcome was time from hospital arrival to ECPR initiation. Secondary outcomes included favorable neurological outcome at 30 days and incidence of cannulation-related adverse events. Results: Hybrid ED installation led to a significant decrease in time to ECPR initiation. In the interpreted time series analysis for the time from hospital arrival to establishment ECPR, there was statistically significant upward level change and downward trend change after the installation of hybrid ED. These results mean the time from hospital arrival to the establishment of ECPR was prolonged just after installation of hybrid ER, and the time from hospital arrival to the establishment of ECPR was shortened over time. There were no statistically significant differences between the conventional and hybrid ED groups on the favorable neurological outcome and cannulation-related adverse events. Conclusions: The installation of hybrid ED was associated with shortened time from hospital arrival to establishment of ECPR. Further evaluation is needed to elucidate the effects of hybrid ED on OHCA and determine an optimal strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.