ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Genetic Causal Relationship Between Sex Hormones and Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The primary aim of this study was to explore whether sex hormones affect the occurrence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) from a genetic perspective using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Methods: Exposure and outcome data for this MR analysis were derived from previously published GWAS studies. In this study, estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), bioavailable testosterone, and total testosterone were used as exposures, and BCC was used as the outcome for the two-sample MR analysis. The random effects inverse variance weighted (IVW) model was the primary analytical model, and the simple mode, weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted mode methods were applied as complementary approaches. Furthermore, the "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis was performed to assess stability, Cochran's Q test to evaluate heterogeneity, and the MR-Egger intercept test to analyze horizontal multiplicity. Results: The two-sample MR analysis of the sex hormone and BCC showed that estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), bioavailable testosterone, and total testosterone were not a causal factor in BCC (P>0.05). The results of the heterogeneity test and horizontal pleiotropic analysis showed that no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropic existed in all MR analyses (Cochran's Q-P>0.05, Egger intercept-P>0.05). Conclusion: The two-sample MR analysis showed that estrogen and testosterone did not affect the occurrence and development of BCC at the genetic level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.