ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2024
Rethinking Thin-Layer Chromatography for Screening Technetium-99m Radiolabeled Polymer Nanoparticles.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-57-based intercomparison of TLC scanners and dose calibrators for low-activity radiochemical purity assessment in radiopharmaceutical quality control.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is commonly employed to screen technetium-99m labeled polymer nanoparticle batches for unreduced pertechnetate and radio-colloidal impurities. Although this method is widely accepted, our findings applying radiolabeled PLGA/PLA-PEG nanoparticles underscore its lack of transferability between different settings and its limitations as a standalone quality control tool. While TLC profiles may appear similar for purified and radiocolloid containing nanoparticle formulations, their in vivo behavior can vary significantly, as demonstrated by discrepancies between TLC results and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and biodistribution data. This highlights the urgent need for a case-by-case evaluation of TLC methods for each specific nanoparticle type. Our study revealed that polymeric nanoparticles cannot be considered analytically uniform entities in the context of TLC analysis, emphasizing the complex interplay between nanoparticle composition, radiolabeling conditions, and subsequent biological behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.