ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of a machine learning-based prediction model for unfavorable discharge outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive performance of machine learning models in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- A screening model for advanced colorectal neoplasia based on tumor markers and inflammatory indices: a retrospective study with an online risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic stroke is a common and serious disease with economic and healthcare burdens. Predicting the unfavorable discharge outcome of patients is essential for formulating appropriate treatment strategies and providing personalized care. Therefore, this study aims to establish and validate a prediction model based on machine learning methods to accurately predict the discharge outcome of ischemic stroke patients, providing valuable information for clinical decision making. Methods: The derivation data consisted of 964 patients from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and was used for training and internal validation. A favourable discharge outcome was defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≤1 or a decrease of ≥8 points compared to the admission score. A predictive model was created based on 88 medical characteristics gathered during the patient's initial admission, using nine machine learning algorithms. The model's predictive performance was compared using various evaluation metrics. The final model's feature importance was ranked and explained using the Shapley additive explanation method. Findings: The random forest model demonstrated the greatest discriminative ability among the nine machine learning models. We created an interpretable random forest model by ranking and reducing the features based on their importance, which included eight features. In internal validations, the final model accurately predicted the discharge outcomes of ischemic stroke with AUC values of 0.903 and has been translated into a convenient tool to facilitate its utility in clinical settings. Conclusions: Our explainable ML model was not only successfully developed to accurately predict discharge outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke and it mitigated the concern of the "black-box" issue with an undirect interpretation of the ML technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.