Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296217›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Geographical analysis of fluoride and nitrate and its probabilistic health risk assessment utilizing Monte Carlo simulation and GIS in potable water in rural areas of Mathura region, Uttar Pradesh, northern India.

Shahjad Ali, Salman Ahmad, Mohammad Usama, Raisul Islam, Azhar Shadab, Rajesh Kumar Deolia, Jitendra Kumar, Ayoob Rastegar, Ali Akbar Mohammadi, Shadab Khurshid and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shahjad AliDepartment of Environmental Science, Sharda School of Smart Agriculture, Sharda University Agra, Keetham, Agra, 282007 India.
Salman AhmadInterdisciplinary Department of Remote Sensing and GIS Applications, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Mohammad UsamaDepartment of Environmental Science, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Raisul IslamDepartment of Civil Engineering, GLA University Mathura, India.
Azhar ShadabDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering G. L. Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201306, India.
Rajesh Kumar DeoliaDepartment of Applied Science (Mathematics), G.L. Bajaj Group of Institutions, Mathura, India.
Jitendra KumarDepartment of Mathematics and Computing, Madhav Institute of Technology and Science, Gwalior, India.
Ayoob RastegarDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Health and Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Ali Akbar MohammadiDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.
Shadab KhurshidInterdisciplinary Department of Remote Sensing and GIS Applications, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Vahide OskoeiSchool of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Seyed Alireza NazariMedical Nanotechnology Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine. Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human health is being increasingly exposed to fluoride and nitrate ingestion globally due to anthropogenic alternations in groundwater resources. In the present research work, a hazard quotient (HQ), Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), and geographic information systems (GIS) have been used to estimate the non-carcinogenic health risk of nitrate and fluoride in vulnerable adults, teenagers, and children living in far-flung areas of Uttar Pradesh, Northern India. About 110 samples from some nearby populations were collected and analyzed for nitrates by ion chromatography and fluoride by a fluoride-selective electrode. The results indicated that the concentrations of fluoride and nitrate in the sampling areas ranged from 0.21 to 1.71 mg/L and 0.4-183.54 mg/L, respectively, with mean concentrations of about 1.20 mg/L and 51.52 mg/L for fluoride and nitrate, respectively. The results indicated that 27.27 % of the fluoride samples (27 out of 110) and 45.45 % of the nitrate samples (44 out of 110) were above the standard limits set by WHO. The calculated average HQ values fluoride and Nitrate for children, teenagers and adults were 1.88, 0.98, 0.90 and 3.02, 1.57, 1.45 respectively The 95th percentile HQ values for fluoride were 2.87 for children and 1.03 for adults, while those for nitrate were 4.10 for children and 1.98 for adults. Results of the health risk assessment show that there is a high potential for both non-carcinogenic and cancer risks from fluoride and nitrate through the consumption of groundwater. The Monte Carlo simulation showed the uncertainties and increased risks for children; therefore, one can infer that rural groundwater of the Mathura region, Uttar Pradesh, India, must be treated to make it potable for consumption.

Indexed as

ContaminationFluorideHealth risk assessmentMathura rural areaMonte Carlo simulationNitrateProbabilistic

Identifiers

PMID39296217
PMCPMC11408152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.