ArticleHeliyon2024
Detection of real-time deep fakes and face forgery in video conferencing employing generative adversarial networks.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As facial modification technology advances rapidly, it poses a challenge to methods used to detect fake faces. The advent of deep learning and AI-based technologies has led to the creation of counterfeit photographs that are more difficult to discern apart from real ones. Existing Deep fake detection systems excel at spotting fake content with low visual quality and are easily recognized by visual artifacts. The study employed a unique active forensic strategy Compact Ensemble-based discriminators architecture using Deep Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (CED-DCGAN), for identifying real-time deep fakes in video conferencing. DCGAN focuses on video-deep fake detection on features since technologies for creating convincing fakes are improving rapidly. As a first step towards recognizing DCGAN-generated images, split real-time video images into frames containing essential elements and then use that bandwidth to train an ensemble-based discriminator as a classifier. Spectra anomalies are produced by up-sampling processes, standard procedures in GAN systems for making large amounts of fake data films. The Compact Ensemble discriminator (CED) concentrates on the most distinguishing feature between the natural and synthetic images, giving the generators a robust training signal. As empirical results on publicly available datasets show, the suggested algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods and the proposed CED-DCGAN technique successfully detects high-fidelity deep fakes in video conferencing and generalizes well when comparing with other techniques. Python tool is used for implementing this proposed study and the accuracy obtained for proposed work is 98.23 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.