Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296142›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Estimating Iowa's riverine phosphorus concentrations via water quality surrogacy.

Elliot S Anderson, Keith E Schilling, Chris S Jones, Larry J Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elliot S AndersonIowa Geological Survey, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Keith E SchillingIowa Geological Survey, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Chris S JonesIIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering (retired), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Larry J WeberIIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is a widespread waterborne pollutant that impairs many waterbodies. However, it is challenging to measure directly, and much research has been dedicated to developing surrogacy models that can repeatedly predict its concentration. Optimal approaches for modeling strategies are often unclear and depend upon local P dynamics and the availability of financial and technical resources. This study presents a schema for developing P surrogacy models at a statewide scale (16 major rivers in Iowa, USA). Specifically, we examined the relationship between particulate phosphorus (Part P) and orthophosphate (OP) and explored the viability of eight potential surrogates in predicting their concentrations using multiple linear regression and power regression methods. We also investigated similarities between surrogate models for Part P and total suspended solids (TSS). At all sites, OP and Part P were not strongly correlated (mean R = 0.20 ± 0.17). Many instances were observed where samples had high concentrations of one form but not the other. Modeling results demonstrated that turbidity was consistently the best predictor (t-statistics >10) of Part P, and adding other surrogates alongside turbidity did little to improve model performance. No surrogates proved useful in estimating OP. Viable power regression models were created using turbidity to predict Part P (mean R

Indexed as

IowaPhosphorusSurrogacyTurbidity

Identifiers

PMID39296142
PMCPMC11408025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.