ArticleHeliyon2024
Machine learning based androgen receptor regulatory gene-related random forest survival model for precise treatment decision in prostate cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regression analysis and validation of risk factors for upper limb dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting lung metastasis risk in differentiated thyroid cancer based on two databases.Gland surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing stroke-associated pneumonia prediction in ischemic stroke: An interpretable Bayesian network approach.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It has been demonstrated that aberrant androgen receptor (AR) signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa). To date, the most efficacious strategy for the treatment of PCa remains to target the AR signaling axis. However, numerous PCa patients still face the issue of overtreatment or undertreatment. The establishment of a precise risk prediction model is urgently needed to distinguish patients with high-risk and select appropriate treatment modalities. Methods: In this study, a consensus AR regulatory gene-related signature (ARS) was developed by integrating a total of 101 algorithm combinations of 10 machine learning algorithms. We evaluated the value of ARS in predicting patient prognosis and the therapeutic effects of the various treatments. Additionally, we conducted a screening of therapeutic targets and agents for high-risk patients, followed by the verification in vitro and in vivo. Results: ARS was an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence and distant metastasis in PCa patients. The enhanced and consistent prognostic predictive capability of ARS across various platforms was confirmed when compared with 44 previously published signatures. More importantly, PCa patients in the ARS Conclusions: Collectively, this prediction model based on AR regulatory genes holds great clinical translational potential to solve the dilemma of treatment choice and identify potential novel therapeutic targets in PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.