ArticleHeliyon2024
Improving inter-session performance via relevant session-transfer for multi-session motor imagery classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor imagery BCI enables more practical and user-friendly exoskeleton control than smartwatch for users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A confidence-gated source selection strategy for cross-session transfer in brain-computer interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Intersession Robust Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface: Safe and User-Friendly Approach with LED Activation Mechanism.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Review
- Neurophysiological screening of individual variability for robust decoding in c-VEP-based BCI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) using electroencephalography (EEG) have found practical applications in external device control. However, the non-stationary nature of EEG signals remains to obstruct BCI performance across multiple sessions, even for the same user. In this study, we aim to address the impact of non-stationarity, also known as inter-session variability, on multi-session MI classification performance by introducing a novel approach, the relevant session-transfer (RST) method. Leveraging the cosine similarity as a benchmark, the RST method transfers relevant EEG data from the previous session to the current one. The effectiveness of the proposed RST method was investigated through performance comparisons with the self-calibrating method, which uses only the data from the current session, and the whole-session transfer method, which utilizes data from all prior sessions. We validated the effectiveness of these methods using two datasets: a large MI public dataset (Shu Dataset) and our own dataset of gait-related MI, which includes both healthy participants and individuals with spinal cord injuries. Our experimental results revealed that the proposed RST method leads to a 2.29 % improvement (p < 0.001) in the Shu Dataset and up to a 6.37 % improvement in our dataset when compared to the self-calibrating method. Moreover, our method surpassed the performance of the recent highest-performing method that utilized the Shu Dataset, providing further support for the efficacy of the RST method in improving multi-session MI classification performance. Consequently, our findings confirm that the proposed RST method can improve classification performance across multiple sessions in practical MI-BCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.