Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296019›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Optimal features selection in the high dimensional data based on robust technique: Application to different health database.

Ibrar Hussain, Moiz Qureshi, Muhammad Ismail, Hasnain Iftikhar, Justyna Zywiołek, Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ibrar HussainDepartment of Statistics Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan.
Moiz QureshiGovt Boys Degree College Tandojam, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.
Muhammad IsmailCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hasnain IftikharDepartment of Statistics, Quaid-i-Azam University, 45320, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Justyna ZywiołekFaculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, 42-200, Poland.
Javier Linkolk López-GonzalesEscuela de Posgrado, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bio-informatics and gene expression analysis face major hurdles when dealing with high-dimensional data, where the number of variables or genes much outweighs the number of samples. These difficulties are exacerbated, particularly in microarray data processing, by redundant genes that do not significantly contribute to the response variable. To address this issue, gene selection emerges as a feasible method for identifying the most important genes, hence reducing the generalization error of classification algorithms. This paper introduces a new hybrid approach for gene selection by combining the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) score with the robust Mood median test. The Mood median test is beneficial for reducing the impact of outliers in non-normal or skewed data since it may successfully identify genes with significant changes across groups. The SNR score measures the significance of a gene's classification by comparing the gap between class means and within-class variability. By integrating both of these approaches, the suggested approach aims to find genes that are significant for classification tasks. The major objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this combination approach in choosing the optimal genes. A significant P-value is consistently identified for each gene using the Mood median test and the SNR score. By dividing the SNR value of each gene by its significant P-value, the Md score is calculated. Genes with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) have been considered favorable due to their minimal noise influence and significant classification importance. To verify the effectiveness of the selected genes, the study utilizes two dependable classification techniques: Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). These algorithms were chosen due to their track record of successfully completing categorization-related tasks. The performance of the selected genes is evaluated using two metrics: error reduction and classification accuracy. These metrics offer an in-depth assessment of how well the selected genes improve classification accuracy and consistency. According to the findings, the hybrid approach put out here outperforms conventional gene selection methods in high-dimensional datasets and has lower classification error rates. There are considerable improvements in classification accuracy and error reduction when specific genes are exposed to the Random Forest and KNN classifiers. The outcomes demonstrate how this hybrid technique might be a helpful tool to improve gene selection processes in bioinformatics.

Indexed as

High-dimensional dataHybrid techniqueMachine learning modelsMood median testOptimizing gene selectionSingle noise ratio score

Identifiers

PMID39296019
PMCPMC11408077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.