ArticleHeliyon2024
Non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic steatosis with ultrasound images using deep learning network.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of fatty pancreas and its associations with pancreatic disease and metabolic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 124 studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- MASLD and Pancreatic Diseases: From Shared Mechanisms to Clinical Implications and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The Fatty Pancreas: Current Evidence, Treatment Implications, and Future Directions.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- The Fat-Pancreas Axis: A Narrative Review Unraveling the Role of Obesity in Pancreatic Diseases.Cureus · 2025Review
- Fatty pancreas disease in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients: a case-control study on relationships with glycemic control and exocrine function.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Biomarkers in the Era of Big Data and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Relationship between pancreatic morphological changes and diabetes in autoimmune pancreatitis: Multimodal medical imaging assessment has important potential.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to verify whether pancreatic steatosis (PS) is an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We also developed and validated a deep learning model for the diagnosis of PS using ultrasonography (US) images based on histological classifications. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analysed data from 139 patients who underwent US imaging of the pancreas followed by pancreatic resection at our medical institution. Logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the independent predictors of T2DM. The diagnostic efficacy of the deep learning model for PS was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and compared with traditional visual assessment methodology in US imaging. Results: The incidence rate of PS in the study cohort was 64.7 %. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age (P = 0.003) and the presence of PS (P = 0.048) were independent factors associated with T2DM. The deep learning model demonstrated robust diagnostic capabilities for PS, with areas under the curve of 0.901 and 0.837, sensitivities of 0.895 and 0.920, specificities of 0.700 and 0.765, accuracies of 0.814 and 0.857, and F1-scores of 0.850 and 0.885 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. These metrics significantly outperformed those of conventional US imaging (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045, respectively). Conclusion: The deep learning model significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound for PS detection. Its high sensitivity could facilitate widespread screening for PS in large populations, aiding in the early identification of individuals at an elevated risk for T2DM in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.